SpaceX Plans for Texas Site Expansion
(Source: SPACErePORT)
SpaceX's Boca Chica site is increasingly busy with Starship
fabrication, processing, launches, landings, and explosions. SpaceX has
mapped out plans for expanding the site. Click here.
(3/8)
How the Rocket Business Launched a
Wave of Blank Check Acquisitions (Source: Quartz)
In 2019, Virgin Galactic took a small step for a space company—and a
giant leap for global finance. It became a publicly traded company
through a merger with a special purpose acquisition company, or SPAC.
The transaction kicked off a trend, with risky private ventures of all
stripes arriving on public markets through the same mechanism. In 2019,
there were 87 SPAC transactions, with an average value of about $390
million, according to the financial data firm Refinitiv. In 2020, there
were 163, with an average value of $965 million. And in the first two
months of 2021, there have been 72 SPAC transactions, with average
value of over $2 billion.
Companies in the space sector are taking advantage. We’re still waiting
for the first traditional space IPO, but seven SPACs have made deals to
bring space firms public at a cumulative value of more than $20
billion, driven by investor lust for anything akin to Elon Musk’s
SpaceX, one of the largest and fastest-growing private companies in the
world. Two years later, Virgin hasn’t hit any of the revenue
projections that justified its public value. But public markets have an
unusual craving for risky bets. And with large private firms
experimenting with other alternatives to the traditional public
offering, like direct stock listings, blank check companies are seen as
a route to give investors what they want.
Because the deal is technically an acquisition, securities regulators
allow SPACs to include projected future revenues in their investor
pitches, shifting focus away from actual business results. The SPAC’s
sponsor and the company it is acquiring can publicly hype their stock
in ways not allowed during a typical IPO. And the deals typically
include a large investment of private capital that allows management
teams to be more selective about which big investors they bring into
their company. (3/8)
The Age of Human Space Flight is Over
(Source: Washington Post)
The question is not can we, but should we send humans to Mars. If you
want to do science, the answer is no. Think how many robots we could
send to Mars for the cost of one crewed mission. Think how much more
sophisticated those robots will become in the time it takes to get a
human mission to Mars. And we have the technology right now to do it.
No need to spend billions on a heavy-lift rocket. The age of crewed
space flight is over. The International Space Station is an orbiting
white elephant, sucking money out of true space exploration. Sell it
for $1 to Elon Musk and let him pay to ferry crews up. (3/5)
Space Launch from British Soil One
Step Closer (Source: Parabolic Arc)
A giant leap in British spaceflight history is being made today (5
March 2021) as the government publishes its commercial spaceflight
consultation response, paving the way for space launches from UK soil.
Over the past few months, the government has been inviting industry,
stakeholders and the public to have their say on the rules that will
govern our spaceflight program – and the consultation has captured the
imagination of people across the UK, including schoolchildren.
The resulting legislation will help to propel the development of
commercial spaceflight technologies, from traditional rockets launched
vertically into space to high-altitude balloons and spaceplanes, with
launches potentially taking place within the next few years. Spaceports
could also be built in south-west England, Scotland and Wales,
inspiring and exciting a new generation of scientists and engineers,
creating high-skilled jobs and cementing the government’s aim for the
UK to be the location of the first launches of this type in Europe.
(3/5)
SpaceX's New FCC Filing Requests To
Operate Starlink 'In Moving Vehicles, Vessels & Aircraft'
(Source: Tesmanian)
SpaceX is already providing Starlink satellite broadband internet in
the United States and abroad. With approximately 1,205 satellites in
orbit the company is accepting service pre-orders via Starlink.com.
Starlink customers use a phased-array dish antenna and Wi-Fi router to
receive high-speed internet service from the satellites. The service is
currently limited to a specific region and address, the dish antenna
cannot be moved far from the specific user location to receive
connection.
“Your Starlink is assigned to a single cell,” the company says, “If you
move your Starlink outside of its assigned cell, a satellite will not
be scheduled to serve your Starlink and you will not receive internet.”
SpaceX has plans to make Starlink service available on the move,
according to a new FCC filing published. It requests to operate
Starlink terminals ‘in moving vehicles, vessels, and aircraft.’
“The Commission has granted a blanket license for operation of up to
one million end-user customer Earth stations [dish antennas]. SpaceX
Services seeks a blanket license authorizing operation of such end-user
earth stations for deployment as Vehicle-Mounted Earth Stations
(“VMESs”), Earth Stations on Vessels (“ESVs”), and Earth Stations
Aboard Aircraft (“ESAAs”) (collectively, Earth Stations in Motion
(“ESIMs”)),” SpaceX wrote. (3/5)
NASA's New Race to Put a Woman on the
Moon (Source: CBS News)
The new push to the moon has been plagued by doubts, cost overruns, and
delays. But we found something else interesting when we visited NASA:
the Artemis program isn't just named for a woman, it's largely being
run by women. And the pool of 18 Artemis astronauts has already been
chosen. Nine women, nine men. Six of whom are test pilots, four have
Ph.D.'s, three are medical doctors. It's not known yet which of them
will fly to the moon, but two are in space right now on the
International Space Station. (3/8)
Garver Points to Irony of NASA's SLS
Approach (Source: CBS News)
The most powerful rocket ever is called the Space Launch System, or
SLS. In development for a decade, it has yet to fly; and has only fired
its four main engines once, in a test. The SLS, the Space Launch
System, is mockingly referred to as the Senate Launch System. The
industry said they would do it for $6 billion in six years. That was
the rocket. It's been $20 billion in 11 years. "I would not have
recommended the government build a $27 billion rocket, when the private
sector is building rockets nearly as large for no cost to the
taxpayer," said Lori Garver.
The Space Launch System has work that's over 45 states and over 1,100
vendors. So the Space Launch System is a national vehicle. That means
jobs. That means that, across the nation, for the SLS alone, there's
over 25,000 people that have jobs. Garver points to the irony: "NASA,
the very symbol of a democratic and capitalist society-- has done a lot
of its human spaceflight programs in more of a socialist way." The
top-down approach, Garver says, has produced a NASA SLS rocket that'll
cost more than $2 billion for every launch, while SpaceX flies its
Falcon Heavy for a fraction of that. (3/8)
Air Force Maintains Medical Mission
Supporting Space Force (Source: USAF)
The U.S. Space Force was established in December 2019 as a lean,
mission-focused branch of military service and is supported by a
medical team charged with maintaining readiness for both the Guardians
who operate and protect U.S. space capabilities and the Airmen assigned
to Space Force units. Support functions of the Space Force, including
medical care, are provided by the Air Force.
Medical care for Guardians is built upon the established structure that
provided care to the former Air Force Space Command, and falls under
the responsibility of the Air Force and Space Force Surgeon General,
Lt. Gen. Dorothy Hogg. In this capacity for the Space Force, Hogg
advises the Secretary of the Air Force, the Air Force Chief of Staff,
the Chief of Space Operations, and the Assistant Secretary of Defense
for Health Affairs on the unique medical aspects of conducting space
operations and the health of Guardians and the Airmen assigned to Space
Force units. (3/3)
India Plans Geostationary Launch in
March (Source: PTI)
India will launch a geostationary orbit Earth observation satellite
later this month. The Indian space agency ISRO said it's preparing to
launch the GISAT-1 satellite on March 28 on a GSLV rocket. The
satellite will provide continuous imaging of the Indian subcontinent
from geostationary orbit. The satellite was to launch a year ago, but
was postponed for unidentified technical reasons. (3/8)
Perseverance Starts Driving
(Source: Space News)
NASA's Mars Perseverance rover has started driving on Mars. Project
officials said Friday the rover made its first drive a day earlier, two
weeks after landing on the planet. Checkouts of the rover's systems and
instruments are going well, and mission planners are planning routes
for the rover to follow to reach the remnants of the river delta that
is of interest to scientists. Engineers are also preparing to test the
Ingenuity helicopter attached to Perseverance, with those flight tests
expected some time in the spring. (3/8)
Republican Members Want Space Policy
Updates From Biden (Source: Space News)
Two Republican members of the House Science Committee are asking the
Biden administration to keep them in the loop on space policy issues.
Reps. Frank Lucas (R-OK) and Brian Babin (R-TX), ranking members of the
full committee and space subcommittee respectively, released letters
Friday they sent to the Commerce, Defense and State Departments asking
for details on their plans to propose rules and protocols for space
activities. That includes concepts for codes of conduct for space
activities as well as work on space traffic management. (3/8)
LinQuest to Support Space Force
Analytics (Source: Space News)
LinQuest won a $500 million contract to provide analysis support for
the U.S. Space Force. The contract, announced Friday but awarded two
months earlier, covers "tradespace analysis support" for the service
over five years. That work had been done by The Perduco Group, a
provider of data analytics, modeling and simulation services for
military and intelligence agencies that was acquired by LinQuest in
2019. (3/8)
Hubble Enters Safe Mode After Software
Glitch (Source: NASA)
The Hubble Space Telescope went into safe mode Sunday because of a
software glitch. NASA said an "onboard software error" triggered the
safe mode around 4 a.m. Eastern Sunday. The spacecraft is "safe and
stable," NASA said, and engineers are working to return the orbiting
observatory to normal operations. NASA didn't state when that work will
be completed. (3/8)
NSF Estimates $50 Million for Arecibo
Cleanup (Source: Space News)
The National Science Foundation estimates it will cost up to $50
million to clean up debris from the collapsed Arecibo radio telescope.
In a report to Congress released Friday, the NSF said that work to
clean up the site after the 305-meter telescope's observing platform
collapsed in December will cost $30 million to $50 million, spread out
over the current and next fiscal years.
The report did not endorse any proposals to rebuild the telescope,
saying that it requires extensive study, starting with a community
workshop scheduled for this spring. Arecibo Observatory has proposed a
concept for a next-generation telescope that would consist of a tightly
packed array of smaller dishes with the same diameter as the original
telescope, a proposal it estimates would cost about $450 million. (3/8)
Astronauts Upgrade ISS Power System
with Spacewalks (Source: CBS)
Two astronauts continued work Friday to upgrade the International Space
Station's power system. NASA's Kate Rubins and JAXA's Soichi Noguchi
spent nearly seven hours outside the station, completing work started
on a previous spacewalk to assemble structures that will be used for
new solar panels to be installed later this year. The astronauts did
not get to other work planned for the spacewalk, such as installing
electrical connections for an experiment platform, after Rubins noted a
"pinprick hole" in one of her gloves. While there was no loss of
pressure, station controllers decided to wrap up the spacewalk rather
than perform the additional tasks. (3/8)
Starship Goes Up. Starship Goes Down.
But is the Program Moving Forward? (Source: Ars Technica)
SpaceX engineers must be delighted to have figured out the vexing
issues with propellant and Raptor relighting that had scuttled the two
previous landing attempts. This was a consistent problem with the
Falcon 9 program, and its simpler Merlin engine design, in making a
successful landing. For a Starship to land after only its third
high-altitude flight is notable. SpaceX, too, will take away a lot of
meaningful data from this launch, flight, and landing that it can use
to refine both the design of Starship as well as its flight software.
What we don't know is how NASA will see this. Will it be deemed
progress? Or as a negative, with the third destruction of a Starship in
three flights? This matters as the agency gets closer to a down-select
next month for its Human Landing System contract that could see
billions of dollars flow to SpaceX for its Starship program—or not.
NASA may decide to go with more conventional landers under development
by teams led by Blue Origin and Dynetics.
With that said, NASA is not stupid. Starship is undergoing a unique
development program, progressing through rapid iterations and taking
risks by design. Each failed mission buys down risk for future flights.
It's no accident that SpaceX is building a new Starship every two or
three weeks in South Texas. Being hardware-rich means you can move
fast, try, fail, try again, and ultimately succeed. (3/3)
Inside the Alabama Stop on Blue
Origin’s Journey to the Moon (Source: AL.com)
Blue Origin’s rocket engine plant in Huntsville, Ala., is the size of
three city blocks. Objects on one side can be larger – much larger -
than they appear from the other side. On a recent visit to the year-old
plant in Cummings Research Park, Blue Origin moon landing team leader
John Couluris pointed across the white factory interior to a gold box
on legs. This was what we had come to see.
Blue Origin’s team is called the National Team and consists also of
Lockheed Martin, Northrop Grumman and Draper Technologies. The other
two teams in running are led by Dynetics, another Huntsville company,
and by SpaceX. All of them will build pathfinders like the one in the
Huntsville plant. It’s a traditional development step to assure the
final spacecraft can maneuver as intended, fit together with other
parts as intended and give crews the sight lines from the inside that
they need to operate, among other things.
All of that is technical news about how it’s all done, but standing
beside the golden box on legs in Huntsville has more impact. It makes
much clearer the size of America’s next journey to the moon. It’s a big
lander for a big mission, and NASA’s Marshall Space Flight Center in
Huntsville is managing the lander team selection. NASA’s “down-select”
to the final contractors is on hold for another two months. Couluris
said the team is “refining our design” in the meantime and buying and
building equipment for later flight vehicles. The first thing finished
will be the flight version of the model on the Huntsville factory
floor. (3/8)
Putting the SpaceX-FAA Dispute in
Context (Source: Space Review)
A SpaceX Starship prototype launched and landed—and exploded—last week,
but without the drama of the regulatory dispute with the FAA seen a
month earlier. Wayne Eleazer explains the origins of the rule that led
to the battle between SpaceX and the FAA. Click here.
(3/8)
The New Era of Private Human Orbital
Spaceflight (Source: Space Review)
It’s been more than a decade since the last private astronaut flew in
orbit, but that is set to change later this year. Jeff Foust reports on
recent developments from commercial Crew Dragon missions to a proposed
Starship flight around the Moon. Click here.
(3/8)
The Enduring Fantasy of Space Hotels
(Source: Space Review)
A proposed rotating space hotel, complete with luxury suites and
gourmet restaurants, made headlines last week. A.J. Mackenzie argues
it’s just the latest in a long line of space hotel concepts whose
visions failed to match reality. Click here.
(3/8)
No comments:
Post a Comment