Florida Looks to Space Tourism Despite
Virgin Accident (Source: Florida Today)
Local officials have long seen Kennedy Space Center's former shuttle
runway as an ideal place for space tourists to take off and land,
possibly some day flying aboard Virgin Galactic. Space Florida
president and CEO Frank DiBello is confident such flights are
inevitable despite Virgin's test flight disaster Friday in Mojave,
Calif., which killed one pilot and seriously injured another.
"I'm deeply saddened by today's tragedy," said DiBello, who chairs the
Commercial Spaceflight Federation's board. "I continue to have
confidence in the industry, and that they're going to be able to figure
out the anomaly, correct it and get back on a path toward democratizing
space and opening space up for the citizen astronaut." Virgin had no
plans to fly in Florida unless demand warranted an expansion from its
initial home base at Spaceport America in New Mexico.
But another company that plans to fly tourists, Mojave-based XCOR
Aerospace, does intend to perform test flights from KSC's Shuttle
Landing Facility, possibly by early 2016. Florida Senator Bill Nelson
had this to say: "This has been a tragic week for our commercial space
sector, but I'm confident that we will learn from the investigations of
these two accidents and take steps to prevent them from happening
again." (11/1)
Fine Unlikely for Boat that Delayed
Antares Launch (Source: DelMarVa Now)
The boat that delayed by a day the launch of the ill-fated Antares
rocket was in international waters, meaning the Coast Guard likely
cannot impose a fine for the infraction. Thousands of space enthusiasts
on the East Coast were disappointed when the launch was scrubbed
minutes before launch time on Oct. 27 because a 26-foot sailboat had
strayed into the danger zone.
"We can't really quantify it for you, but it's not cheap," Orbital
spokesman Barron Beneski said of the cost of the one-day delay. The
sailboat was about 40 miles out to sea, NASA Wallops Flight Facility
Director Bill Wrobel said. It was in the first of two avoidance areas
for the launch — the one set for the first rocket stage.
The area extends some 50 nautical miles out from shore in a wedge
shape, some 37 nautical miles wide near the shore and 17 nautical miles
wide at its outer limit. The vessel was well beyond the 12 nautical
miles over which the United States exercises sovereignty. (11/2)
Shuttle Monument Dedicated During
Titusville Ceremony (Source: Florida Today)
Facing a crowd next to an eight-ton stainless steel space shuttle
emblem, astronaut Bob Crippen reminisced about his NASA spaceflight
career that started in April 1981. "When I look back on the program, it
was a great experience. Yes, we had two terrible tragedies. But every
time it happened, the program picked itself up by its bootstraps and
got the program back flying again — and flying safely," said Crippen,
who orbited the earth aboard shuttle Columbia during STS-1.
Saturday morning, a jacket-wearing crowd attended the dedication
ceremony of the 15-foot-tall shuttle monument at Space View Park. The
audience was largely comprised of current and retired space workers,
some dating to the Mercury, Gemini and Apollo days. (11/1)
Spaceport Pioneers Group Hosts Event
Honoring Past, Future (Source: SpaceFlight Insider)
The Missile, Space and Range Pioneers held a social and dinner in Cocoa
Beach on Nov. 1. The event included industry veterans, insiders and
up-and-comers who helped to underscore the rich history -- and
potentially exciting future -- that the group hopes to preserve and
inspire. (11/2)
Analysis: Will Space Accidents Deter
Pioneer Tourists? (Source: CNN)
Aerospace insiders routinely compare the emerging commercial space
industry to the genesis of the aviation industry -- high risk, high
reward. [But] passengers want to know they are going to be safe.
Friday's accident will surely instill fear in the more than 700 people
who have signed up to make the journey. So what is the value of space
tourism? And why risk human lives to make it a reality?
As George Whitesides told CNN earlier this year: "At heart, what
inspires me the most is the idea that space changes you, that space has
this profound impact on the people that can experience it." What
Whitesides is referring to is the overview effect, a phenomenon that
space travelers are said to experience when they see the curvature of
the Earth -- changing the way people see the world, thereby influencing
the way in which they live.
Both Whitesides and Branson have spoken openly about the fact that
suborbital flights are not the ultimate end goal for Virgin Galactic.
Point-to-point intercontinental travel would be the next application of
this technology, meaning that one day passengers could travel around
the world in about two hours. While such plans have been put on hold
since the accident, Virgin Galactic is intent on taking off. The
question is, will people still be willing to pay $250,000 to go to
space? (11/1)
Branson: No One has Demanded a
$250,000 Refund (Source: CS Monitor)
On Saturday, Richard Branson said none of the money provided for seat
deposits has been spent and anyone who wanted a refund could get it,
but no one has asked. Rather, he said, someone signed up on the day of
the accident in a show of support. "They've been patient to date," he
said of his customers. "I think most of them will be patient longer."
(11/2)
Did the Crew Compartment Fail?
(Source: Daily Beast)
I asked a former NASA astronaut, who cannot be quoted on the record, to
look at photographs of the debris. The most-intact section of this
image is the dark, bowl-shaped object. This looks similar to what is
called a pressure bulkhead in airplanes that seals the part of the
fuselage that is pressurized from the rest of the structure...
“The tank contains the oxidizer nitrous oxide and not fuel, which is a
solid plastic in the motor, so I would have thought it would be very
stable and not too heat sensitive. If it is the tank, then it looks
reasonably intact, suggesting it did not fail. And the solid rocket
propellant would not blow up in one explosion since it cannot do that
without an oxidizer. It could have had a burn-through like
Challenger Shuttle, but I would have thought that would take longer.
"So keeping in mind the evidence is paltry at this time, I think it is
possible that the crew module pressure vessel failed structurally
resulting in a massive depressurization event followed by breakup. That
would explain why we do not see any cabin, although it could be out
there, and just not filmed. It would also explain the photograph that
shows the engine still burning as the breaking up vehicle tumbles tail
first.” (11/2)
DoD, Industry Huddle As Civil Firms
Gain (Source: Defense News)
The big issues of the day facing the Pentagon and its defense
industrial base go far deeper than developing the next generation
fighter or aircraft carrier, top industry analysts warn. With
commercial companies outpacing the defense industry’s ability to
develop and field cyber, satellite and communications capabilities —
and with those companies competing hard for the top engineering and
software development talent — the Pentagon and its industry partners
will need to chart a new path forward.
With the work that some of the leading tech companies like Google,
Amazon, Palantir and ViaSat have done for the Pentagon, “are these
companies going to become defense companies? No, why would they want
to?” said W. Alexander Vacca, corporate director, business assessment
at Northrop Grumman. “The profits are lower, the opportunities smaller,
there’s too much red tape” for some of these firms to want to dive too
deeply into federal government work. (11/1)
Texas Spaceport Business Park is
Foundation for Aerospace (Source: Midland Reporter-Telegram)
Spaceport Business Park is coming to Midland. While the announcement of
the business park took a back seat to last week’s Orbital Outfitter
groundbreaking, its impact could be the most significant step toward
diversification we have seen in quite some time. Spaceport Business
Park, located at Midland International Air and Space Port, will start
as the home of XCOR Aerospace and Orbital Outfitters, but expectations
are that the spaceport will be an inviting location for other members
of the nation’s aerospace industry.
The governor’s office has so much confidence in what will take place
that it is giving Midland Spaceport Corp. $2 million to develop the
area. Part of that money will be applied to projects for XCOR,
according to Robert Rendall, a Midland Development Corp. point man on
projects such as XCOR and Orbital Outfitters. The rest of the money,
Rendall said, will go toward the infrastructure the MDC and city will
need for the business park. (11/1)
Fregat Design Ambiguity Steered
Galileo Wrong (Source: GPS World)
The root cause of the anomaly that sent two Galileo satellites into the
wrong orbit on August 22 was a shortcoming in the system thermal
analysis performed during stage design, and not an operator error
during stage assembly, according to findings by an independent inquiry
board.
The independent inquiry board was created by Arianespace, in
conjunction with the European Space Agency and the European Commission.
Its conclusions draw on data supplied by Russian partners in the
program, and are consistent with the final conclusions of the inquiry
board appointed by the Russian space agency Roscosmos. (11/1)
State Sorting Out Potential Liability
in Antares Launch Explosion (Source: Richmond Times-Dispatch)
Virginia is likely to share the liability of damage to the Mid-Atlantic
Regional Spaceport from the fiery destruction of an unmanned supply
rocket on the Eastern Shore, but the final cost to the state is far
from clear, state officials said Friday. The spaceport at Wallops
Island is run by a quasi-governmental authority that receives $16
million each year from the state’s transportation fund, and the $150
million launch pad was built with $100 million in state bond proceeds.
State officials say private insurance may cover at least some of the
damage under a memorandum of understanding with the private company
responsible for the aborted launch, but the spaceport itself is
self-insured. “There’s no obligation for the state, but I don’t know
where else they’d get the money from,” said Secretary of Transportation
Aubrey L. Layne Jr., a member of the board of the Virginia Commercial
Space Flight Authority that oversees the spaceport.
State legislative leaders said they would wait for a clearer assessment
of the damage and memorandum of understanding with Orbital Sciences
Corp. before commenting on the state’s potential liability. Spaceport
officials said Friday that they are conducting “an in-depth engineering
assessment to determine a detailed cost estimate for facility repairs.”
The spaceport said its second launch pad was not damaged by the
explosion. (11/2)
Some Consequences for Virgin Galactic
(Source: Daily Beast)
There are many consequences to this failure. Not the least is what it
implies for the financing of the project. After years of delays the
costs have gone beyond a billion dollars. More than a third of that
money has come from Abar, an investment fund based in Abu Dhabi. (This
was made available in return for an undertaking by Virgin to build a
space tourism base in the Gulf.) By any measure, this accident will
have set back the development program by years. Will backers want to
pour ever more money into this black hole?
Then there is the case of Spaceport America in New Mexico, near the
small city of Truth & Consequences. This cost local taxpayers $212
million to build in the hope that they would become the center of the
new industry of space tourism.
It’s not exactly clear how many people have signed up to ride SpaceShip
One – Galactic has claimed that as many as 800 people have paid
deposits on the $250,000 fare but the numbers are squishy. For these
people the disaster over the Mojave Desert is a sobering wake-up call.
What to many must have seemed the prospect of a spectacular joy ride is
now better appreciated as a thrill from the very edge of what is safely
attainable. (11/1)
Flight Path to Disaster: A Clash of
High Risk and Hyperbole (Source: Daily Beast)
All Virgin Galactic test flying was done under an FAA experimental
permit. To reach the point where SpaceShip Two could carry passengers
Virgin needed an operator’s license. That required a new 180-day review
by the FAA to establish that all the systems were thoroughly tested and
fail-safe. But this was uncharted territory for the FAA just as it was
for Virgin. By submitting to the FAA review Virgin was being asked to
set the standards for all who followed.
It was a very tall order. Branson wanted a vehicle that could carry six
passengers, two pilots and reach a speed of 2,500mph and a height of
around 65 miles, ten times the height at which an airliner cruises.
When the FAA certifies a new airliner it is normal for the airplane
builder, like Boeing, to put as many a six airplanes into the test
program, all flying at the same time, to test every aspect of the
design and its safety. Even then it can take several years to receive
certification.
But here Virgin was fielding only one vehicle that embodied a whole set
of completely untried systems. Everything was being staked on the two
test pilots being able to anticipate potential failures and the ground
engineers likewise poring over the test results to detect weak points
before they had catastrophic results. Despite this, Virgin asked the
FAA to begin their review for the operator’s license in August 2013,
and that was when the 180-day clock started ticking. Click here.
(11/1)
Change Likely to Limits on FAA
Spaceflight Regulation (Source: SPACErePORT)
At the urging of launch industry advocates in 2004, Congress moved to
limit the ability of the FAA's Office of Commercial Space
Transportation (AST) to promulgate new safety regulations for the
emerging commercial human spaceflight industry. A eight-year
"moratorium" on new regulations (called a "learning period") was put in
place to prevent the infant industry from being smothered by government
oversight.
In 2012, given the industry's continued lack of flight experience,
Congress extended the moratorium until October 1, 2015. So, in essence,
Congress has limited the FAA's ability to develop new regulations that
might have made Virgin Galactic's operations more safe. In lieu of
taking regulatory action, FAA-AST took steps to work with spaceflight
carriers so they could gain insight into safety issues and draft
regulations that could be promulgated after the moratorium expired.
Unfortunately, given the Republican leadership's disdain for government
regulation, Congress also has severely underfunded FAA-AST, affording
the shortstaffed office a limited capability to perform the kinds of
oversight and coordination required to adequately plan for the
industry's safe operations. Perhaps one positive development from the
Virgin Galactic disaster will be a better funded and more capable
FAA-AST. (11/2)
Virgin Repeatedly Warned by Experts
About Safety Issues (Source: Daily Mail)
Space flight experts have accused Virgin Galactic of ignoring warnings
over its safety procedures in the wake of a fatal explosion aboard one
of its spacecraft. Senior engineers and propulsion scientists say they
spent years telling Richard Branson's private space line its procedures
are 'outdated', needlessly secretive, and could lead to people getting
killed. Michael Alsbury, 39, died at the controls of Virgin's
experimental SpaceShipTwo vessel on Friday after the sub-orbital plane
exploded at 45,000ft shortly after engaging its engines. His co-pilot,
Peter Siebold, was seriously injured.
And, in a further sign of upheaval at Virgin Galactic, it was revealed
that top engineers in charge of safety, aerodynamics and the propulsion
system have all recently quit the company. Many of the warnings stem
from a 2007 engine test disaster in the Mojave Desert that killed three
employees of Virgin Galactic's partner company, Scaled Composites. Some
have accused Branson's project of ignoring industry standards and
refusing to share its procedures in its eagerness to perfect commercial
space flight, which it has regularly estimated is just months from
completion.
One expert called the design and testing process a 'Russian roulette'
which was bound to kill someone. Geoff Daly also revealed that he wrote
to the U.S. Chemical Safety Board urging them to do something about his
safety concerns over SpaceShipTwo. Writing in July 2013, he said even
the company's own engineers privately doubted that their venture was
safe. Click here.
(11/1)
Branson Spaceship Explosion: The
'Missed' Warnings (Source: The Telegaph)
Virgin Galactic, in an attempt at damage limitation, initially
dismissed the explosion as an “anomaly”. However, aerospace experts
insisted that it had been a disaster waiting to happen. Tom Bower, an
investigative journalist and Sir Richard’s biographer, described the
crash as “predictable and inevitable”. He said: “It’s a very crude
rocket.”
Carolynne Campbell, the lead expert on rocket propulsion at the
International Association for the Advancement of Space Safety (IAASS),
said: “This explosion is not a surprise. None whatsoever, I am sorry to
say. It is exactly what I was expecting. It was Russian roulette which
test flight blew up.” In emails sent by Geoff Daly, a US-based British
rocket scientist, to officials at the FAA last year, he warned of
another disaster if test flights were given the go-ahead.
Tomasso Sgobba, executive director of IAASS and the former head of
safety at the European Space Agency, said that Virgin Galactic had
refused to share information with industry experts outside the company
and declined to have its rocket design peer-reviewed. Representatives
of Virgin Galactic had refused to come to IAASS meetings, he said.
(11/1)
Deceased Virgin Galactic Pilot
Identified (Source: Daily Mail)
The pilot who died in a tragic accident aboard Virgin's SpaceShipTwo
has been identified. Michael Alsbury, a father of two and pilot with
Scaled Composites, was killed on Friday when SpaceShipTwo exploded just
minutes after it detached from its mother ship, WhiteKnightTwo.
Michelle Saling, Alsbury's widow, told MailOnline, 'I have lost the
love of my life. I am living in hell right now.'
Alsbury had flown numerous missions on SpaceShipTwo for years,
including the all important first successful rocket-powered run in
April 2013. He was also the pilot in the first glide flight back in
2010, and flew as recently as August 28 of this year. In video from the
2013 mission, it is clear what a humble man Alsbury was, and just how
dedicated he was to his job. (11/1)
No comments:
Post a Comment